Showing posts with label international queer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label international queer. Show all posts

24 September 2012

What is it with beautiful boys and the beyond?

Sometimes, I hate hanging out at my office at the university, especially when the sun decides to give way to the moon, and I am still there to witness the transition.

Comme ca.
[September 2012 at the University of the Philippines Film Institute]

This is because sometimes, I still remember this boy who once climbed the side roof illegally to claim the frisbee that he and his friends were playing with, which happened to land right outside my window. Yes, climb, because my office is on the second floor of our film school building. And as I was staring out the window, he startled me when his head popped outside my window, sheepishly grinning at me at the knowledge of his illegal activity, but he knew that I will just smile back startled and shrug it off. And I did.

And this boy, he was a brilliant talent. During the time I started teaching, the institute also gave me a job as an academic coordinator, so I had close contact with the kids. More than a professor, perhaps the kids also saw me as a friend. When his best friend was in trouble, he ran to me for help and we tried to solve it. When it was his turn to be in trouble, somewhat, his best friend ran to me for help as well. And more than a professor, I helped them as a friend. Gaining their trust, he sometimes comes to me all excited, wanting me to see his extra-curricular film projects he created for the sake of creating images in film, just for the pure love of. And I was flattered that he valued my opinion and asked what I thought of these extra projects of his. They were all good, but I didn't give him all that. I wanted to teach him humility as well, so I encouraged him but did not praise him to high heavens. Because these kids -- like my generation before when we were also studying there decades ago -- they had the tendency to develop their egos first before their talents. Needless to say, this boy had a balance of both. All of these things sometimes makes me feel that it was worth it to give up my life outside the academe and focus on life inside the academe. If only for moments like these, you know. If only.

But still, this boy, we also officially helped him achieve the steps that led to his dreams -- the dream to be a good imagemaker, because he has a good eye, a promising young cinematographer in the making. An exchange scholarship abroad, a slot in a master class, we tried helping him. But sometimes, we figured that he also should try to help himself. But such is life, I guess.

Has a good eye. I should have said had. He had a good eye. Because he is not here with us anymore. Very early, he chose to go to the great beyond, where the films he planned to shoot we will not have the privilege to see anymore. One boy who went early towards the beyond. For whatever reason that tormented him inside, we have no privilege of knowing. But the time and talent he showed us and shared with us, the trust and comfort he afforded me during the time we were sharing a space during a certain time, perhaps that was enough. Perhaps that was just right, even if many people around him thought otherwise. A life wasted, a life full of promise. But I don't believe anything goes to waste in this world. Maybe that short, short life of his was enough to make tangents out there that will last beyond anyone's lifetime. And maybe we don't even have to question why.

Today, as I went about my way on the interwebs, I was also reminded of another beautiful boy. Like my previous student, this young man also decided to go to the beyond earlier than what we all expected.

 
I cannot remember what was happening here 
but I remember  we were having a good time. 
That you don't forget, especially when you are 
with unforgettable queer folks. 
[early 2011 somewhere in Cubao X]

I met this young man through one of my queer friends and colleague at the university. And during our first meeting, we already hit it off. He was here as an official participant of his government to some civil society program where university grads like him got the chance to work in developing countries to focus on the advocacies they are interested in. They had a hard time deciphering his language at first but since I have this special device embedded in my being to adopt and understand accents, I had no trouble understanding his Oz speak. And since he also identified as queer, like me, we hit it off even more. 

Soon, I learned that at a young age, he started a non-profit organization in his hometown to help underprivileged kids to have access to education and stuff like that. It was too bad that his org was small and can't accommodate foreign workers (I was contemplating on applying for an opening there early this year) but he promised to pimp me to the uni circles there as he said he believed in my talent and capacity. Very flattering. He was also constantly telling me to go visit him there in Melbourne since I will fit into the queer scene there perfectly, he said, as I've voiced to him several times that I don't think I fit into the queer scene in Manila anymore, or perhaps I'm looking for more, something else. He said I will feel at home there in Melbourne. He promised to tour me around if I did go there, and I was actually trying to save up to make that happen one day. But no more. Not that I don't have money but I don't have him anymore to tour me around. Because this beautiful boy, he also decided to go to the beyond, way earlier than we all expected.

He once told me that had I been a boy, he would have slept with me. 
And I said had he been a girl, I would have slept with him as well.
 So we became good friends hahaha! So no, nothing happened between us
but he slept with some other boy and I slept with some other girl 
and we told each other about it hehe. Queering friendships indeed. 
[early 2011 somewhere in Cubao X]

And as I sit here in the middle of the coffeeshop trying to suppress my tears due to his passing, I began to wonder what is it with these beautiful boys and the beyond, particularly this move to chase it way ahead than what is expected. Why jump the gun? Is there a race to begin with? But in my almost four decades of being on this earth, somehow, I understand. Perhaps because part of me echoes the sentiments of these beautiful boys, harboring secrets inside of them that cannot be broadcast in any social network of any kind. People are strange that way, and secretive. And that has to be respected, and not judged. No, no judgments. Any good book containing any tenet of faith will tell us that we have no right to judge because it is not in our place to do so. Whether one subscribes to any of these tenets or faiths, it doesn't matter. Perhaps basic human thinking should make us feel that each of us function differently from others, even if we have similarities of some sort as well. We cannot second-guess things, we cannot jump to conclusions about things. 

And yes, to tell you the truth, I understand. Because once upon a time, I was there, where these beautiful boys were. At that edge of jumping, of chasing the beyond, earlier than expected. It was often said and studied that those who are thinking of ending it do not really announce it to the world. They just do it. Life is not always happy and some of us have a hard time adjusting. I was half a step away from doing it. I almost did. But for the life of me, I don't know what made me stop, what pulled me back. And then it was just a matter of reframing things, of how I looked at the world. Like an imagemaker who had difficulty capturing a good picture, one adjusts the tools to make the vision clearer. Like what I've often said before, when life is a blur, refocus. But it took me decades to arrive at that new tenet, and it wasn't all that easy a journey, I should say.

Queers with beers in Baguio. Great times indeed. [June 2011]
 
But still, I guess the universe still wants me to do something else, that's why I'm still here. Whatever that is, I'm not yet sure. And perhaps the universe determined that these beautiful boys only needed to be here with us to shine as good examples, super bright lights to inspire us to do more. Perhaps that is their role in the great scheme of things. They are like those stars in the sky that has already collapsed a long time ago but their shine and sparkle are still there and still visible in the night sky. They are those stars. And we have to admire the sparkle. Yes, they still shine. They still do. And that is how they will be seen. 

To my queer mate, you go gently into that good night, you hear? I know you're up there smiling at us. Don't worry. After being sad for a bit, I will look up and smile back at you. Shoot me back a star in the night sky to say hello once in a while, okay? You take care, dude. You take care. We miss you.

And stay as queer as you are, okay dude? 
[June 2011 in Baguio City]
 

29 June 2011

this just (sinking) in

Because of the whole hullaballoooooo this weekend -- mega/super/mighty-rainy Manila, a threatening fraaaaaaak-not-again-almost-repeat of Marikina Ondoy flooding, an unsure northern exposure trip, and finally undergoing that trip with the whole rainy shebang (along with the other controversies of the Baguio pride festivities woooohoooooo), plus the almost-cancellation of the raison d'etre of that freaking trip (and also catching up with warmhearted welcoming queer kindred spirits in the city of pines whom I love love loooove so dearly and who love me back!!!) -- and the days following that -- facing classes amidst deadlines and covering/participating in the UP Diliman pride march and other pride-related activities -- and generally catching up with life as it "normalizes" (whatever the fuck that means) -- I was just able to catch up on the historic news from New York just about now, after reading the New York Times and other news sources about what transpired there Friday night (Saturday noontime here in Manila).

Yeah, legalizing queer marriage in NYC.

Can I just say wooooooooooooooooooooooooot!

But let me get that straight. In a manner of speaking.

I am one for equality, equity and all that jazz. Not that we queers are all after assimilation with the rest of straight society (as I believe society as a construct also needs major major reinvention), but I am not one to dis others who want to undergo this ritual. I still hold the position I've always held since I was 17 years old (one of two unbending principles of my life: that one, I w
on't get married ever and I'll fight to death anyone who forces me into it; and two, I won't get pregnant ever and hey, even if I get raped and accidentally get preggy, I'll abort it, no [moral] questions asked, man, so sue me) -- that marriage as an entity needs questioning, challenging and reconstruction, because it is quite a problematic structure for me (as I've personally seen it in my family), especially within the Catholic viewpoint in patriarchal Philippines. But I will support anyone in my queer community who would still want to undergo such a ceremony. Yes, there is diversity in our rainbow community and I uphold it. This is also the belief about marriage we've collectively shared and upheld in my defunct lesbian org UP Sappho before, and I've carried this opinion before and after its demise.

But hey, for all you know, I might also renege on this principle I've upheld if I meet someone whom I believe is worth it, worth popping that question, worth living with for the rest of my life/her life (whichever ends first) or 'til divorce do us part (but just the marriage one; the preggy principle still holds and will never fold). But still, it's good to know that there are places in the world where you could go to have your relationship solidified with such an imperfect love sealant. If not Spain, Denmark, Belgium, Argentina, Canada or I
celand, then hey, Nooyawk!

Gosh. What I'd give to be in Stonewall Inn at that very moment. Very historic. For all of us.


me in front of the legendary Stonewall Inn
along Christopher Street in NYC (March 2010)


Ang saya-saya!

I guess this means those who wanna get hitched na could already do that. Good for them.

As for the rest of us folks here in the third world, well... we still dream. I'm writing an article about this now. Will post when it gets published.

In the meantime, we cheer with NYC. In the end, love should always win, and always prevail, as this surprisingly touching quote sums it up from, all of people, one of the Republicans who voted for the bill, as quoted in that NYT artik above:

With his position still undeclared, Senator Mark J. Grisanti, a Republican from Buffalo who had sought office promising to oppose same-sex marriage, told his colleagues he had agonized for months before concluding he had been wrong.

“I apologize for those who feel offended,” Mr. Grisanti said, adding, “I cannot deny a person, a human being, a taxpayer, a worker, the people of my district and across this state, the State of New York, and those people who make this the great state that it is the same rights that I have with my wife.”

O di ba? Ikaw na, Gristanti, ang wagi! Chos.


15 January 2011

a quest to find beautiful souls

When I am not publicly blogging in this space, I am pouring my heart out in a space called DL, which offers some (form of) positive and (sort of) safe space for women like me.

But this particular rumination I think I could share here.

This is for all of you who are, like me, also in the process of challenging (homo)normative notions and structures of desire.

May our tribe increase.

------

a quest to find beautiful souls


Sometimes I look around this space and I look at my spaces offline. And it seems that I see the similar people around. If ever I wanted to engage with some girl, I don't think it would work well for me, simply because I lack this thing called anonymity. Hence the slim pickings when it comes to scanning for possible engagements.

Anonymity doesn't work well for me in this country, perhaps because of the career choices and artistic engagements I have chosen to pursue. Plus there's this thing called the age gap, which people find a negative thing here most times. Plus there's this thing called homonormativity, which basically means the only alternative to being single is being coupled. No chance of entertaining gray areas of engagements. Most people are afraid to reconstruct their notions of desire in this country, it seems. And that makes me sad. And frustrated.

Which gets me thinking. What about the girls, the attractions, the flirtations? In a city with a population of 11 million (and rising), Metro Manila feels so ridiculously small for me now, like what a friend in the US echoed before. Another friend in the US also mentioned the anonymity she has been enjoying over the years since she chose to be a New Yorker instead of a Manilenya. I am getting cues from them now.

This girl I have been seeing recently asked me once why I never got it on with s
omeone here in Manila ever since I became single again, since I could practically have anyone I choose, she says, because of who I am and how I look or maybe how I am (yes, she flatters me so). And I said one simple thing: I don't see anyone who interests me that much or in that way here, recently, lately. Or maybe that's a harsh judgment to make. Maybe I haven't been circulating much is more proper to say, since everywhere you look, there are a lot of women-loving-women you could actually hook up with if you are not so damn choosy.

Ah yes, but that's my problem. Perhaps I am too choosy. Or am I?

Well, depends. I think I have to be attracted to someone that intensely before I could make any move. And what attracts me these days? Open-mindedness for one, or the capacity of lacking judgmental traits on one's being, perhaps. Light persona is another, meaning one should not feel burdened by another's drama queen modes and emotional baggage of their pasts, carrying it on in the present. A third one is a challenging intellect, eliminating those beauty without brains people I see scattered all around in this space. And fourth, someone who is open to having sexual encounters without the patriarchal religious baggage we were all born with. Yes, I have shed mine a long long long time ago, and it's sad to note that there are not enough sex-positive women out there in Manila to engage with in this level.

Yes, I am picky like that. Or am I?

I am not one to fall in love this time. Like what I have blogged before, I am curiously mortified to be in love again these days, even if I feel like I am beginning to feel it again at the fringes of my being. Yes, I still am upholding a moratorium on relationships (thank you Alanis for the term) and would like to challenge the homonormative ways of engaging with like-minded and like-bodied people. But sadly, I still think I am in the wrong city/country to be queer, if these are my objectives and intentions.

So it all boils down to having slim pickings. Here, offline, or anywhere else.

And you know what? It sucks. Big time.


Same can, same content? Sometimes.
So help me Warhol. Andy ko kinakaya ito.
(at the Museum of Modern Art, New York /
March 2010 photo by X)



But why am I saying this, even if I am happily seeing someone and engaging with her in all of the ways I wanted to. Well, maybe I am just dreading the time when our engagement will eventually end. As with all other things on earth, happiness also has an expiration date for me with this being, this beautiful soul.

And thus, I wonder when the next beautiful soul would arrive, or from where the next beautiful soul would emerge.

But that's just me. I wonder endlessly. About life, about love, about lust, about satisfaction, about excitement, about contentment.

Yes, I do think a lot. Not that it's a bad thing. On the contrary, it helps me so. To process things and situations objectively. It helps.

So thus, I continue to wonder. And perhaps wander. Out there. But maybe I should expand my horizons more. And hope that more women find more courage to be in this same wavelength that I have been broadcasting from.

But still, it doesn't actually hurt to be alone sometimes. I also need my personal space. And I'd like to retain that, still. And I'm actually happy with that state, to tell you the truth. But of course, sometimes, it pays to be a bit happier.

But that's just me.

12 August 2008

before i call it a night...

share ko lang ang isang headline:

------------------

Dutch bill would ease way to legal parenting for lesbians

Agence France-Presse

Posted date: August 12, 2008


THE HAGUE—A proposed Dutch law would make it easier for the partner of a lesbian mother to become the legal parent of a child born into the relationship, the country's justice ministry said Tuesday.

Currently, they to receive permission from a judge to legally adopt the child.

If approved by parliament, the law would allow the mother to chose whether her lesbian partner or the child's biological father should be the legal co-parent, ministry spokesman Wiebe Alkema told Agence France-Presse.

The Netherlands has been at the forefront of gay liberation for many years, and became the first country to legalize gay marriage, in 2001.

------------------


happy! whole story here.

yeah, if given the chance, i'd really like to have a kid with my partner. sana puwede na ang i-join ang cells namin sa iisang kid, no, para parehong kuha ang byuti namin hehe. parang brangelina lesbian style.

oh well. that, or adoption nga. happy na rin.

sya, nyt.



05 August 2008

ASTRAEA Lesbian Foundation for Justice seeks LGBT grant applicants til Sept1

morning all.

forward ko lang itong announcement from my linkages at Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice based in NY, USA.

although they are identified as primarily a lesbian-focused organization, their grants are open to all in the lgbtqi+++ sphere, lalo na itong Intl Fund for Sexual Minorities. generally, for this, astraea prefers to give grants to groups/orgs/instis, not individuals.

i am a member of the International Advisory Board (Asia-Pacific) of this Intl Fund chever since Feb 2008. pero hindi ako pumupunta sa NY hehe. i wish!!! maybe soon. sooner. hehe. abangan!

may attachments itong kasama.
email me privately so i could send it to you.

apply na! sayang pera. good luck!

feel free to repost din. go!


---------------------




Dear friends,

Greetings from the Astraea Foundation. Hope this email finds you well and that the month of August is fruitful. Here at Astraea we are ready to start the funding cycle of 2008-9. I would like to seek your help in forwarding this call-for-application to your contacts, associates, and allied organizations, as well as networks in your region and beyond. Your support is greatly appreciated.

The Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice seeks applications for the next cycle of our International Fund for Sexual Minorities (due date for complete applications is Monday September 1st, 2008).

We encourage applications via email (to be sent to grants@astraeafoundation.org) from organizations in the Global South and Global East - Africa, the Middle East, the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Attached is the application and guidelines, with more information. Below are some highlights of Astraea's panel guidelines (one-year grants):

  • For lesbian, trans, intersex, LGBTI, women's rights, or human rights organizations (for non LGBTI-groups we fund projects for and by LGBTI communities within the organization) located in the Global South and Global East that are working towards social change on LGBTI issues
  • Groups must have a budget of $500,00 USD or less
  • Groups should generally be operating for at least one year
    • The maximum grant is $10,000 USD
    • We fund GENERAL SUPPORT or Project Support
    • Applications must be complete, including support materials, such as recent and current financials and letters of support from within their countries!
    • Though the application is in English and Spanish only, we accept applications in any language
    • More information about the International Fund and the types of groups we've funded in the past on our website at www.astraeafoundation.org and in the attached application and funding guidelines

Thank you for your kind assistance.

In solidarity,

Mai
Mai Kiang
Associate Director of Grantmaking

Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice

116 East 16th Street
New York, NY 10003

21 May 2007

2007 homophobia hall of shame

got this in my mail today. thought i'd share this here. bida kasi tayo, e, lalo na yung isang government official nating super...super. basta. read.

  • Bienvenido Abante, Member of the Philippine House of Representatives and Chair of the House Committee on Civil, Political and Human Rights: for trying to force his sexual orientation on others. Representative Abante has urged that homosexuals be “cured” and turned into heterosexuals. He has repeatedly blocked a landmark bill that would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the Philippines. He has also suggested that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people are excluded from the “definition” of human rights.

and he is a walking proof that politics in the philippines are really... hay nakuh, anything i say is an understatement to describe its enormous stupidity. ewan. kaya nawawalan ako ng gana sa pagboto dahil mga mokong like him ang nananalo, but at the same time ganado akong bumoto to prevent mokongs like him from winning. unless mandaya. hay nakuh. look at what happened to danton. grrrr.

for an extensive look at abante's paatras na stupid shenanigans in congress, read the accounts on the lagablab blog.

syempre hindi na surprise ang numero uno. aba, e mag-elect ba naman kasi sila ng third reich-ish pontifical chuva... gudlak sa world.

-------


For Immediate Release

‘Hall of Shame’ Exposes Dangers of High-Level Homophobia

International Day Against Homophobia Highlights Persistence of Prejudice

(New York, May 16, 2007) – Pope Benedict XVI, US President George W. Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have undermined human rights by actively promoting prejudice against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, Human Rights Watch said today in its annual “hall of shame” to mark the International Day Against Homophobia.

On May 17, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender groups in more than 50 countries will commemorate the International Day Against Homophobia, an initiative launched in 2005 that commemorates the day in 1990 when the World Health Organization removed homosexuality from its roster of disorders.

At the same time, Human Rights Watch also pointed to four areas where advances in human rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people have given reason for hope.

“This ‘hall of shame’ does not claim to include the worst offenders, but it highlights leaders who have lent their authority to denying basic human rights,” said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. “Bush and Pope Benedict both speak of human dignity, but their homophobic words and actions undermine families and endanger health.”


Leaders named to the “Hall of Shame” for their actions in the past year are:

  • Pope Benedict XVI: for undermining families. The leader of the Holy See has gone well beyond expressing the Church’s theological views on homosexuality. The Pope has intervened in politics in many other countries to condemn and threaten figures who support equal rights or any form of recognition for lesbian and gay families. After Spain legalized same-sex marriage in 2005, Pope Benedict’s Pontifical Council on the Family commanded Spanish officials to refuse to marry same-sex couples or even to process the paperwork if they tried to adopt a child.

  • US President George W. Bush: for jeopardizing public health. The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) requires that one-third of HIV-prevention spending go to so-called “abstinence-until-marriage” programs. These programs threaten the health of LGBT people by sending a message that there is no safe way for them to have sex, and by denying them life-saving information. In some countries, such as Uganda, grants from the $15 billion PEPFAR program have funded groups that actively promote homophobia; in others, they have drastically reduced condom provision.

  • Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: for creating public and private scandals. President Ahmadinejad has overseen a widening campaign to “counter public immorality,” arbitrarily arresting thousands of Iranians for dressing or behaving differently. In recent weeks, for example, thousands of women have been detained for not conforming to “correct” Islamic dress. In Iran’s surveillance society, Ahmadinejad also uses religious vigilantes to raid homes and other private places in search of “deviant” behavior – including homosexual conduct. The Iranian regime polices public behavior and violates the right to privacy on a massive scale.

  • Roman Giertych, Polish Minister of Education and Deputy Prime Minister: for endangering children. Part of a right-wing government that has made homophobia a centerpiece of policy, Giertych’s education ministry has proposed a law to fine or imprison teachers, school officials, or student human rights defenders who even mention homosexuality. Vital facts about safer sex and protection against HIV/AIDS could be banned from schools under the new law.

  • Bienvenido Abante, Member of the Philippine House of Representatives and Chair of the House Committee on Civil, Political and Human Rights: for trying to force his sexual orientation on others. Representative Abante has urged that homosexuals be “cured” and turned into heterosexuals. He has repeatedly blocked a landmark bill that would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the Philippines. He has also suggested that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people are excluded from the “definition” of human rights.

“Homophobia endangers basic human rights, and we should all be concerned by it,” said Long. “Governments devalue families when they deny any family recognition. They endanger children when they silence any child.”

Human Rights Watch also pointed to large and small gains that give reason for hope:

  • In Nepal, after years of abuse directed at lesbians, gays, and transgender people during a violent civil war, the authorities in February gave a meti (transgender person) in February an official citizenship ID with a gender listed as neither male nor female. This was first time that a government in South Asia has given transgender identity full state recognition.

  • In Denmark, Parliament in June extended equal access to reproductive technologies to lesbians and single women. Denmark in 1989 became the first country in the world to create civil unions for same-sex partners, but such unions have still discriminated against same-sex couples in many areas, including reproduction. The Danish decision marked a recognition of women’s equal worth as parents, and a further step toward full equality.

  • In Mexico, Mexico City and the northeastern state of Coahuila passed civil-union laws opening recognition to same-sex couples. Unions solemnized in Coahuila must be recognized as valid across Mexico. These moves come after the 2003 passage of a sweeping federal antidiscrimination law offering protection against unequal treatment based on sexual orientation.

  • Internationally, the Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Law in Relation to Issues of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity were launched during the March session of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Adopted in November at a meeting of international legal experts in the Indonesian city of Yogyakarta, these groundbreaking principles spell out the international legal standards under which governments and other actors should end violence, abuse and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, and ensure full equality.

The 2007 Hall of Shame

For undermining families: Pope Benedict XVI. The Vatican, which holds special observer status in the United Nations, has not been shy in using its political weight to oppose extending basic human rights to same-sex couples. Pope Benedict XVI has actively intervened in politics to quash recognition for lesbian and gay families, and to threaten people who support it. The result has been to stigmatize lesbian and gay couples and make their families more vulnerable.

In January, the Pope told Italian politicians that any plans to recognize unions other than traditional marriage would "appear dangerous and counterproductive.'' When the Italian government proposed civil unions for same-sex couples, Catholic bishops warned lawmakers that they had “the moral duty to clearly and publicly voice their disagreement and vote against any proposed law that would recognize homosexual couples.” In
Italy and other countries, church officials have suggested that supporters of gay rights as well as reproductive rights could be excommunicated.

When
Spain passed a law guaranteeing civil marriage to all in 2005, a high Vatican official warned Spaniards to defy the measure. Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo of Colombia, head of the Pontifical Council on the Family, said officials should refuse to marry same-sex couples or even process the paperwork if they tried to adopt a child. “A law as deeply inequitable as this one is not an obligation,” he said.

Church officials have supported legal discrimination and rejected lesbian and gay families in other ways. This year Catholic bishops in the
UK pushed hard, but unsuccessfully, for exemption of Catholic agencies from antidiscrimination legislation. In 2006, Catholic Charities in Massachusetts announced that it would cease adoption services altogether rather than obey an antidiscrimination law requiring equal treatment for same-sex couples in placing children who need homes.

For jeopardizing health: George W. Bush, President of the
United States. In 2003, the US Congress authorized President George W. Bush’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a five-year, US$15 billion program to provide funding for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria to 15 countries. Under a provision supported by the Bush administration, however, at least one-third of PEPFAR prevention funds must be spent on programs promoting abstinence until marriage.

These programs discriminate against lesbians and gays and put their health at risk. Since lesbians and gays cannot marry in most countries, including all 15 PEPFAR countries, abstinence programs convey a message that there is no safe way for them to have sex, and deny them information that could save their lives. Funds devoted to abstinence-only education are funds taken away from prevention programs that could address the health and sexualities of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. .

Moreover, abstinence-only programs convey a message about the intrinsic wrongfulness of homosexual conduct that reinforces social stigma and prejudice, to potentially devastating effect. In
Uganda, for instance, PEPFAR-funded safer-sex education materials were revised to state that premarital sex and homosexuality “violate religious or cultural moral standards” and are “immoral.” PEPFAR funds have been given to groups that explicitly promote homophobia in Uganda.

PEPFAR’s authorizing legislation also requires that nongovernmental organizations adopt agency-wide policies pledging their opposition to sex work as a condition of receiving US funds for international anti-AIDS work. These restrictions have had a devastating effect on anti-AIDS work among sex workers. Organizations doing lifesaving anti-AIDS work have lost US funding due to these restrictions, or have curtailed effective programs out of fear that they would be seen as “promoting prostitution.” This requirement jeopardizes groups’ ability to combat HIV/AIDS in high-risk communities, such as transgender sex workers. The provision clashes with internationally-recognized best practices on public health and human rights standards.

For endangering children: Roman Giertych, Minister of Education and Deputy Prime Minister of
Poland. The leader of Poland’s far-right party, the League of Polish Families (Liga Polskich Rodzin), Giertych said, “There is no room, nor will there ever be any room, for homosexual activism within the school system in Poland on my watch.” In March, his ministry announced it would propose a law to “punish anyone who promotes homosexuality or any other deviance of a sexual nature in education establishments.” Teachers, school principals, visiting educators and student human rights defenders who even mention homosexuality could face dismissal, fines and imprisonment. The ministry also announced that “teachers who reveal their homosexuality will be fired.” These proposals would also prohibit health educators advocating safer sex for lesbians and gays from entering the schools. Previously, the deputy minister of education had called safer-sex materials “negative propaganda.”

In 2005, under Giertych’s control, the ministry had vigorously condemned an international project training youth in issues of gender stereotypes and gender-based discrimination. A ministry official accused the project of “depraving young people.”

Giertych’s policies deprive Polish students of the chance to learn not just about human sexuality, but about tolerance, diversity, and equality. They deny them potentially life-saving information about HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. And they promote an atmosphere of prejudice in schools which could lead to violence.

They are part of a consistent policy of homophobia promoted by President Lech Kaczynski. Last June, for instance, the State Prosecutor’s office ordered local prosecutors to launch investigations into the conduct of “homosexuals” on unsupported and defamatory allegations of “pedophilia.” In 2005 and 2006, authorities in
Warsaw and other cities tried to ban marches in support of LGBT rights. Last year a member of Parliament, Wojciech Wierzejski of the League of Polish Families, called for “deviants” to be “bashed with a baton.”

For trying to force his sexual orientation on others: Representative Bienvenido Abante, Chair, House Committee on Civil, Political and Human Rights,
Philippines. Claiming that homosexuals can be “cured” and turned into heterosexuals, Representative Abante has repeatedly blocked legislative consideration of a landmark bill that would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the Philippines.

Philippine LGBT activists, including the Lesbian and Gay Legislative Advocacy Network (LAGABLAB), have campaigned for the passage of antidiscrimination legislation for more than seven years.

Despite several religious organizations’ support for the bill, Representative Abante has cited both the Qur’an and the Bible in alleging that the legislation promotes a “culture of death.” In a speech in November, he called homosexuality “not normal” and urged “helping gays to learn to function heterosexually.” He claimed he had seen “hundreds of lesbians and gays” who had “changed their lifestyles.” He suggested that LGBT people are excluded from the “definition” of human rights, saying that “It is often the definition that decides whether someone has a human right or not; whether that someone has the right to protection, to a fair trial, to life.”

US-based religious groups working in the
Philippines have campaigned heavily against the bill, promoting the idea that homosexuality is a “curable” behavior and a “perverse deathstyle.”

For creating public and private scandals: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of
Iran. In a spreading campaign to “counter immoral behavior” in Iran, ordinary people who simply look or act differently are at risk. Since early May, thousands of women have been detained for not conforming to “correct” Islamic dress. In April, Iran’s Supreme Court overturned murder sentences against six religious police for killing people they considered “morally corrupt.” The sentence contributes to a growing climate of impunity for vigilante forces.

The Ahmadinejad government regularly violates the right to privacy. Its religious vigilantes carry out brutal raids on homes and other private places in search of “deviant” behavior—including homosexual conduct.

Islamic law and Qur’anic tradition set an extremely high standard of evidence for sexual offenses; proof of homosexual conduct requires a confession repeated four times, or four eyewitnesses to the act. Under these strict terms, convictions would be hard to achieve. However,
Iran’s regime allows conviction based on circumstantial evidence, or “the knowledge of the judge.” Suspicion can thus become proof, further eroding any safeguards for privacy.

Under
Iran’s criminal code, lavat (sexual intercourse between men) is “punishable by death,” while tafkhiz (non-penetrative “foreplay” between men) is punishable by 100 lashes for each partner, and by death on the fourth conviction. The punishment for sexual intercourse between women is 100 lashes, and death after the fourth offense.

The last person known with reasonable certainty to have been sentenced to execution in
Iran for consensual homosexual conduct was in March 2005. There is no information as to whether the sentence has been carried out or not.

For background on leaders named to the “Hall of Shame” for their actions in the past year, please visit: http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/05/16/global15955.htm

For more of Human Rights Watch’s reporting on LGBT human rights, please visit:
http://www.hrw.org/doc/?t=lgbt

For further information, please contact:

In New York, Scott Long (English): +1-212-216-1297; or +1-646-641-5655 (mobile)

In New York, Jessica Stern (English, Spanish): +1-212-216-1867; or +1-646-549-0130 (mobile)